Construction and validation of a prediction model for postoperative infection within one week of totally implantable venous access port surgery
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Department of Vascular Intervention, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China;2.Catheter Department, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China

Clc Number:

+2]]>

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [15]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the risk factors for the infection within one week after totally implantable venous access port(TIVAP)surgery, and establish a prediction model. Methods 650 patients undergoing TIVAP surgery were included in the analysis. 480 cases from January 2017 to January 2022 were as the modeling set, and 170 cases from February 2022 to March 2023 were as the validation set. The modeling set was further divided into the infection group (n=17) and the non-infection group (n=463) according to the occurrence of postoperative infection. General condition and clinical characteristics of patients in two groups were compared using t-test and χ2 test, and risk factors for postoperative infection were analyzed with binary logistic regression. Visualization was realized through nomogram. Results Among the 17 patients in the infection group of the modeling set, 6 had incisional infection, 10 had pocket infection, and only 1 had blood stream infection. Logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥65 years old (OR=3.093, 95%CI: 1.048-9.128, P=0.041), duration of surgery ≥2 hours (OR=3.286, 95%CI: 1.008-10.716, P=0.049), and pocket hematoma (OR=20.200, 95%CI: 6.750-60.455, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for TIVAP postoperative infection. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed an area under the curve of 0.833, sensitivity of 70.6%, and specificity of 88.1%, respectively. Calibration curve analysis showed a good consistency of the predictive model with the actual risk occurrence. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the model had clinical benefits with risk threshold probability between 1% and 60%. Conclusion Age ≥65 years old, duration of surgery ≥2 hours, and pocket hematoma are independent risk factors for the infection within one week after TIVAP surgery. Prediction model constructed based on these factors has a good accuracy and calibration. Healthcare workers should keep in mind the high risk factors of infection and postope- rative infection care procedures, and strengthen postoperative observation on high risk patients.

    Reference
    [1] Marcy PY, Schiappa R, Ferrero JM, et al. Patient satisfaction and acceptance of their totally implanted central venous catheter: a French prospective multicenter study[J]. J Vasc Access, 2017, 18(5): 390-395.
    [2] Bademler S, ü?üncü M, Y1ld1r1m ?, et al. Risk factors for complications in cancer patients with totally implantable access ports: a retrospective study and review of the literature[J]. J Int Med Res, 2019, 47(2): 702-709.
    [3] 贾维慧, 孙香莲, 厉丹阳, 等. 乳腺癌患者静脉输液港导管相关血流感染预测模型构建[J]. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(15): 56-60.
    [4] 高姗, 林江, 李福琴, 等. 完全植入式静脉输液港相关感染的危险因素[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2018, 17(9): 815-818.
    [5] Nezami N, Xing MZ, Groenwald M, et al. Risk factors of infection and role of antibiotic prophylaxis in totally implantable venous access port placement: propensity score matching[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2019, 42(9): 1302-1310.
    [6] 上海市医学会肿瘤内科专科分会, 长三角肿瘤专科联盟. 上臂完全植入式静脉给药装置临床应用专家共识(2022版)[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2023, 32(1): 2-8.
    [7] Barbetakis N, Asteriou C, Kleontas A, et al. Totally implanta-ble central venous access ports. Analysis of 700 cases[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2011, 104(6): 654-656.
    [8] Ji LJ, Yang JH, Miao JZ, et al. Infections related to totally implantable venous-access ports: long-term experience in one center[J]. Cell Biochem Biophys, 2015, 72(1): 235-240.
    [9] Karanlik H, Kurul S, Saip P, et al. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in totally implantable venous access device placement: results of a single-center prospective randomized trial[J]. Am J Surg, 2011, 202(1): 10-15.
    [10] ?im?ek-Yavuz S, Akar AR, Aydo?du S, et al. Consensus report on diagnosis, treatment and prevention of infective endocarditis by Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery (TSCVS), Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (KLIMIK), Turkish Society of Cardiology (TSC), Turkish Society of Nuclear Medicine (TSNM), Turkish Society of Radiology (TSR), Turkish Dental Association (TDA) and Federation of Turkish Pathology Societies (TURKPATH) cardiovascular system study group[J]. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg, 2020, 28(1): 2-42.
    [11] 周晓娟, 马礼坤, 张理想, 等. 构建预测永久性心脏起搏器植入患者术后囊袋感染风险的列线图模型[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2021, 20(10): 881-888.
    [12] Erba PA, Lancellotti P, Vilacosta I, et al. Recommendations on nuclear and multimodality imaging in IE and CIED infections[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2018, 45(10): 1795-1815.
    [13] 宗敏, 常晶, 关晓楠, 等. 衰弱对老年急性心肌梗死患者的影响[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2020, 22(12): 1255-1258.
    [14] 杨柏帅, 王俊奕, 袁敏, 等. 超声结合DSA导引下经左侧腋静脉近侧段输液港植入术[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2019, 28(12): 1197-1201.
    [15] 中心静脉通路上海协作组, 上海市抗癌协会实体肿瘤聚焦诊疗专委会血管通路专家委员会. 完全植入式输液港上海专家共识(2019)[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2019, 28(12): 1123-1128.
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

闫鹤,关晓楠,张海泳,等.完全植入式输液港术后1周感染预测模型的构建与验证[J].中国感染控制杂志,2023,(9):1021-1026. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20234141.
He YAN, Xiao-nan GUAN, Hai-yong ZHANG, et al. Construction and validation of a prediction model for postoperative infection within one week of totally implantable venous access port surgery[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2023,(9):1021-1026. DOI:10.12138/j. issn.1671-9638.20234141.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:116
  • PDF: 417
  • HTML: 488
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:February 27,2023
  • Online: April 28,2024