Effect of different skin disinfectant on the incidence of central venous catheterrelated bloodstream infection
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

R187+.2

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo study the effect of different skin disinfectant on the prevention of catheterrelated bloodstream infection (CRBSI). MethodsClinical control study was used to compare the difference in incidences of CRBSI in patients who used compound skin disinfectant and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) alcohol skin disinfectant before central venous catheterization in the intensive care unit of a tertiary first class hospital between December 2011 and May 2014. ResultsAmong patients who used 2% CHG alcohol skin disinfectant, 2 had CRBSI, one was gramnegative bacterial infection (Pseudomonas aeruginosa), and the other was grampositive bacterial infection (Staphylococcus aureus),incidence of CRBSI was 0.44‰(2/4 546); among patients who used compound skin disinfectant, 22 had CRBSI, 13 were gramnegative bacterial infection, 7 were grampositive bacterial infection, and 2 were fungal infection, incidence of CRBSI was 4.11‰(22/5 349), incidence of CRBSI between two groups of patients was significantly different (χ2=15.640,P<0.01). Conclusion2% CHG alcohol skin disinfectant has a better effect on the skin disinfection before central venous catheterization, which can effectively reduce the incidence of CRBSI in ICU patients, and is worthy of priority clinical application.

    Reference
    Related
Get Citation

程莉莉,张秀月,杨洪艳,等.不同皮肤消毒剂对中心静脉导管相关血流感染发病率的影响[J].中国感染控制杂志英文版,2016,15(11):842-844. DOI:10.3969/j. issn.1671-9638.2016.11.009.
CHENG Lili, ZHANG Xiuyue, YANG Hongyan, et al. Effect of different skin disinfectant on the incidence of central venous catheterrelated bloodstream infection[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2016,15(11):842-844. DOI:10.3969/j. issn.1671-9638.2016.11.009.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:May 28,2016
  • Revised:July 12,2016
  • Adopted:
  • Online: November 30,2016
  • Published: