Significance of serum procalcitonin levels in patients with different bacterial infections
DOI:
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

R446

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo investigate the changes in serum procalcitonin (PCT) levels in patients with different bacterial infections and to evaluate the significance of PCT levels for differentiating grampositive and gramnegative bacterial infection. MethodsTwo hundren and sixtysix intensive care unit(ICU)patients infected with severe bacterial infections were divided into 2 groups (grampositive bacteria group and gramnegative bacteria group) according to the bacterial culture results, and serum PCT, Creaction protein(CRP), white blood cell(WBC) and neutrophil ratio(Neu%) were detected, and data of two groups were analysed statiscally. ResultsSerum levels of PCT in patients with severe bacterial infection significantly rose. When defined by the value of PCT ≥2 ng/mL as positive, the positive rate of PCT in gramnegative bacteria group (92.36%) was significantly higher than that of grampositive bacteria group (76.23%)(χ2=13.45, P<0.001); When the value of PCT ≥10 ng/mL, the possibility of gramnegative bacterial infection was great. The routine infection markers, including CRP,WBC and Neu% , were not significantly different between grampositive bacteria group and gramnegative bacteria group( both P>0.05). ConclusionPCT levels can be used as indicator for differentiating grampositive and gramnegative bacterial infection, and may provide valuable information for sensitive antimicrobial selection.

    Reference
    Related
Get Citation

莫丽亚,张林,邓永超,等.不同类别细菌感染患儿血清降钙素原水平变化[J].中国感染控制杂志英文版,2011,10(3):191-193.
MO Liya, ZHANG Lin, DENG Yongchao, et al. Significance of serum procalcitonin levels in patients with different bacterial infections[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2011,10(3):191-193.

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:December 27,2010
  • Revised:February 10,2011
  • Adopted:
  • Online: May 30,2011
  • Published: