口腔综合治疗台水路管理的文献计量分析

Bibliometric analysis on management of dental unit waterlines

摘要:

目的了解国内外口腔综合治疗台水路(DUWLs)管理研究现状及发展动态。方法在Pubmed、中国知网数据库（CNKI）、万方期刊数据库（WanFang Data）、中文数据库维普全文电子期刊数据库（VIP）和中国生物医学文献数据库（CBM）检索与DUWLs有关的文献，检索时限为建库至2017年12月，采用文献计量学的方法对数据进行分析。结果共纳入270篇文献，其中中文文献109篇，英文文献161篇；纳入文献来自18个国家，发文量排名前五的为中国（110篇）、英国（60篇）、美国（48篇）、波兰（14篇）、印度（10篇），占总文献量的89.63%。国内发文量居前三的省份为江苏省（22篇）、广东省（17篇）、天津市（12篇），占中文文献总量的46.79%。高频主题词共7个，获得一个研究热点：口腔综合治疗台水路污染和控制。第一作者的发文量为1～13篇，本研究中核心作者至少发文3篇以上，共18名核心作者发文81篇，占总文献量的30.00%。结论国内相关研究整体呈上升趋势，但仍需扩大研究的广度和深度。国内相关研究相对集中，但尚未形成核心研究力量；全球研究热点明确，但缺乏统一的水路管理方案。

Abstract:

ObjectiveTo understand current situation and development trend of dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) management at home and abroad.MethodsLiteratures related to DUWLs were retrieved from PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Data, VIP Database, and China Biology Medicine (CBM), retrieval time was from the establishment of database to December 2017, bibliometrics was used to analyze the data.ResultsA total of 270 articles were included, there were 109 Chinese literatures and 161 English literatures; literatures were from 18 countries, the top 5 countries for publication were China (n=110), Britain (n=60), the United States (n=48), Poland (n=14), and India (n=10), accounting for 89.63% of the total literatures. The top three provinces for publication in China were Jiangsu Province (n=22), Guangdong Province (n=17), and Tianjin City (n=12), accounting for 46.79% of the total Chinese literatures. Seven highfrequency words have been obtained, hotspot of research was contamination and control of DUWLs. The first author published 1-13 articles, the core authors published at least 3 articles of this study, 18 core authors published 81 articles, accounting for 30.00% of the total number of articles.ConclusionDomestic research presents rising trend on the whole, but the extent of study still needs to be enlarged. Domestic research is relatively concentrated, but the core research has not yet been formed; hotspot of global study is explicit, but there is no unified management plan.