联合检测炎症指标对不同病原菌血流感染的诊断价值
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

龙军

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R446.11

基金项目:


Diagnostic value of combined detection of inflammatory indicators in bloodstream infection with different pathogenic bacteria
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的探讨联合检测降钙素原(PCT)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞(WBC)和中性粒细胞百分比(NEU%)对革兰阳性(G+)球菌、革兰阴性(G-)杆菌及真菌所致血流感染的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析2014年1月—2015年12月某医院389例血培养阳性患者的检测结果,根据血培养结果分为G+球菌、 G-杆菌和真菌血流感染组,比较不同组别患者的炎症指标是否存在差异。结果经MannWhitney U检验显示,G-杆菌感染组患者血PCT高于G+球菌、真菌感染组(G-杆菌感染组与G+球菌感染组比较:Z=-2.68,P<0.01; G-杆菌感染组与真菌感染组比较:Z=-2.46,P<0.05)。若以PCT≥0.5 ng/mL、CRP≥5.0 mg/L、NEU%≥70%及WBC≥10×109/L作为阳性的截点,统计分析显示,G-杆菌感染组患者血PCT阳性率较G+球菌、真菌感染组高(G-杆菌感染组与G+球菌感染组比较:χ2=5.94,P<0.05;G-杆菌感染组与真菌感染组比较:χ2=7.721,P<0.01); G-杆菌感染组患者血CRP阳性率较G+球菌感染组高(χ2=5.03,P<0.05)。用二分类logistic回归对四项指标在鉴别G+球菌、G-杆菌和真菌血流感染的作用大小比较分析,仅PCT对鉴别G-杆菌、G+球菌和真菌有统计学差异(P<0.01)。结论PCT在区分血培养G-杆菌、G+球菌和真菌时有较高的准确度,若能动态监测PCT,同时结合CRP、WBC、NEU%的结果综合判断,可以在血流感染早期指导临床医生快速判断患者的病情并合理用药,从而降低血流感染患者的病死率。

    Abstract:

    ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnostic value of combined detection of procalcitonin (PCT), Creactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC), and neutrophil percentage (NEU%) in bloodstream infection with grampositive coccus(G+), gramnegative bacillus (G- )and fungus. MethodsDetection results of positive blood culture of 389 patients in a hospital between January 2014 and December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively, according to the results of blood culture, patients were divided into G+ coccus, G- bacillus and fungal bloodstream infection groups, inflammatory indicators of different groups of patients were compared. ResultsMannWhitney U test revealed that PCT level of G- infection group was higher than that of G+ and fungal infection group (comparison between G- infection group and G+ infection group : Z=-2.68,P<0.01;comparison between G- infection group and fungal infection group: Z=-2.46,P<0.05). If PCT≥0.5 ng/mL, CRP≥5.0 mg/L, NEU%≥70% and WBC≥10×109/L were as the cutoff point, statistical analysis revealed the positive rate of PCT in G- infection group was higher than that in G+ and fungal infection group(comparison between G- infection group and G+ infection group:χ2=5.94,P<0.05;comparison between G- infection group and fungal infection group:χ2=7.721,P<0.01);the positive rate of CRP in G- infection group was higher than that in G+ infection group (χ2=5.03,P<0.05). Binary logistic regression was adopted to analyze the efficacy of four indicators for the differentiation of bloodstream infection caused by G+ coccus,   G- bacillus, and fungus, only PCT had significant difference in the identification of bloodstream infection caused by G- bacillus, G+ coccus and fungus(P<0.01). ConclusionPCT has high accuracy in differentiating G- bacillus, G+ coccus, and fungus of blood culture, dynamic monitoring of PCT combined with detection results of CRP, WBC, and NEU%, patient’s condition can be judged rapidly, and antimicrobial agents can be used rationally, so the mortality of patients with bloodstream infection can be reduced.

    参考文献
    相似文献
引用本文

朱天川,袁育妙,龙军.联合检测炎症指标对不同病原菌血流感染的诊断价值[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2017,16(5):444-448. DOI:10.3969/j. issn.1671-9638.2017.05.011.
ZHU Tianchuan, YUAN Yumiao, LONG Jun. Diagnostic value of combined detection of inflammatory indicators in bloodstream infection with different pathogenic bacteria[J]. Chin J Infect Control, 2017,16(5):444-448. DOI:10.3969/j. issn.1671-9638.2017.05.011.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-23
  • 最后修改日期:2016-08-12
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-05-26
  • 出版日期: